I am not, however, excluding the possibility that it could have alternatively been a so-called ANFO (Ammonium-Nitrate Fuel Oil) explosion, in which ammonium-nitrate is the oxidizer, and fuel oil is the fuel for the explosion. Please see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANFO
I used to work in the mining industry and we used TOVEX, a class 2 high explosive, which comes in a long, flexible plastic tube filled with explosive jelly of about the consistency of tapioca pudding, like a big, explosive, sausage — developed by DuPont, and also quite a lot of ANFO, which is blown into bored holes, along with an initiating blasting cap inserted into a tube or two of TOVEX and — WHOOMP! — it will indeed give you quite an impressive explosion. It looks and smells and feels like fertilizer soaked in kerosene, which is approximately what it is.
If there were indeed, 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate stored at the port in Beirut, then to make that explode as we saw, in an approximation of an ANFO detonation, would you not need approximately 160 tons of a fuel source mixed in with the ammonium-nitrate?
17:1 is the approximate ratio of ammonium-nitrate to fuel in an ANFO explosion, so what was the fuel, if it was an ANFO-type of explosion? And how was it delivered and when?
Ammonium-nitrate is the oxidizer. So what was the fuel source that drove the explosion? How did it get mixed in with the ammonium-nitrate? To my mind that is the $64,000 question.
Otherwise, how to explain the spectacular stoichiometry that we saw in Beirut yesterday?
It seems to me that the news accounts are glossing over something. There is a missing element.
There is so much we don’t know about this event. Accepting that there were 2,750 tons of ammonium-nitrate right there by the dock in a warehouse, then that is a massive amount of explosive oxidizer. Almost three kilotons! This fact was widely known by ((((( all ))))) who have eyes and ears in port cities on the eastern Mediterranean. (Give me a minute — I’ll come up with a likely suspect …)
Mix with a hydrocarbon fuel and you get “The Mother Of All Jury-Rigged ANFO Explosions.” Which brings me to my next point.
There is other relevant evidence that i don’t see anyone directly discussing: there was a larger ship at the dock yesterday, and also a smaller vessel, right where the explosion occurred. They are clear in before images, and missing after the blast. Did the explosion vaporize those two vessels? Please see:
https://rense.com//1.mpicons/beirut-ba/01-before.jpg
https://rense.com//1.mpicons/beirut-ba/01-after.jpg
What was on those vessels? What was their cargo? What were the names of the vessels? Who or what are their owners? What were the previous ports of call of the ships?
And then the very next day (today), in the aftermath of all the chaos, death and destruction, two other ships appear at dockside, just on the other end of the pier. Look at the before and after photos. What’s all that about? What are those ships doing there at the site of all the devastation, mere hours later? Where did they come from? Who or what is aboard those ships?
Does anyone know?
The time dimension of an operation can often extend over years and be kept on hold until needed, and then put into play whenever desired. Grease a few corrupt palms, and in a corrupt, port city you can accomplish a lot.
1) First deliver 3 kilotons of ammonium-nitrate and arrange for it to be confiscated/impounded. Park the stuff right there by the dock in a warehouse.
2) Then arrange for a few tons of fireworks to be warehoused immediately next door (!) to the kilotons of ammonium nitrate.
3)Then arrange for a vessel or two — loaded with <> — we do not know, because they were vaporized — to be subsequently docked in front of said, adjacent warehouses with tons of fireworks and kilotons of ammonium-nitrate.
4)Next send in a <welder> — it’s always <welders> or careless <workers> who do the honors in these sorts of affairs — to light things off, and set Hell in motion. Welding sparks, lighting a 150 ft fuse, setting a timed demolition charge, whatever. Such piddling details.
So we have on site: a) a few kilotons of an explosives-grade oxidizer (ammonium-nitrate), b) an ignition source (a few tons of fireworks right next door that <welders> accidentally ignited, and c) two vaporized(?) vessels right at the dock.
Anybody know anything about those vessels?
This whole affair feels real fishy to me.
By the way, one of my sources when I was doing the bulk of my underground bases research, back in the 1990s, was fond of constantly reminding me: “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” He frequently encouraged me to keep digging for information. I can only speculate as to his motivation(s) and why he even talked to me.
He was a polymath, an expert in deep, secret, subsurface bases, electrical engineering, industrial engineering, geochemistry, geology, mining engineering, civil engineering, rocketry and military grade, high explosives and lunar geology. He had a PhD in one of the STEM disciplines. He worked with Edward Teller in the underground levels at Area 51, and was on the Project Apollo lunar landing site selection committee. I once asked him if he had ever worked with any extraterrestrials during his career. He remained emotionally neutral and replied: “I don’t know, but I can tell you that extraterrestrials are a topic of conversation in the canteen at Area 51.”
Most of his work was classified. In our conversations, he impressed on me again and again that government agencies and major and minor Pooh-bahs and muckety-mucks lie — about all sorts of things! — and he provided concrete examples to me.
In other words, dear friends, just because so-called <authorities> — even in the alternative news blogosphere tell us that we are wrong, or that we don’t know what we are talking about, or that we shouldn’t trouble our pretty little heads about something! or that we dare not go there!! — or that we must reflexively submit to their <authority> or they will take their ball and go home, leaving us to play without their self-appointed <authority> — well does that not raise a warning flag??
Doesn’t it?
Something very strange happened in Beirut yesterday and I suggest we keep digging to find out what, who and why!! My antennae are up and quivering and I think any thinking person has plenty of cause to question the story that is being widely spread in the mainstream news media and also in many corners of the alternative new blogosphere.
We don’t know for sure exactly what we are dealing with, and it behooves us to find out as much as we can.
That’s my view. Self-appointed <authorities> who want to reflexively slam shut the door on free and wide-ranging inquiry just because they say so — well, draw the conclusion that you think is most appropriate.
And then there is the remote viewing of last month by Daz Smith, which strongly points to the Beirut explosion as being a planned attack, and not an accident at all. Daz Smith is one of the best remote viewers in the world. He's very, very good. Please see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvE4N2J4x-0
I agree with his viewing. Daz Smith's remote viewing eresonates with my own perception of the event. It was a planned attack upon the people of Lebanon. In my opinion, there are likely to be severe repercussions.
**************************************
I do really need your financial backing! For how to make a cash donation please contact me at: dr.samizdat1618@gmail.com. This is the preferred method of donation for me right now.
I also accept Bitcoin at: 1Dht92qEzCmvuLRKQD2MSJ1JdQ7rFRMVdA
I also accept donations of gold and silver, of any size or amount.
I do not have a bank account and cannot get one, so please DO NOT send me PayPal donations.
I also accept Bitcoin at: 1Dht92qEzCmvuLRKQD2MSJ1JdQ7rFRMVdA
I also accept donations of gold and silver, of any size or amount.
I do not have a bank account and cannot get one, so please DO NOT send me PayPal donations.